Purpose. To compare treatment areas and navigated macular laser photocoagulation (MLP) plans suggested by retro-mode scanning\nlaser ophthalmoscopy (RM-SLO) image versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) central retinal thickness map and treatment\nplanning among retina specialists. Methods. Thirty-nine eyes with diabetic or branch retinal vein occlusion-relatedME undergoing\nnavigated MLP with navigated photocoagulator had OCT and RM-SLO taken. OCTmap and RM-SLO image were imported to the\nphotocoagulator and aligned onto the retina. Two retina specialists placed laser spot marks separately based on OCT and RM-SLO\nimages in a randomfashion.Thespots placed by each physician were compared betweenOCT and RM-SLOand among physicians.\nThe areas of retinal edema on OCT and RM-SLO of the same eye were also compared. Results.The average number of laser spots\nusing RM-SLO and OCT template was 189.6 �± 77.4 and 136.6 �± 46.8, respectively,
Loading....